Dazed and Confused in "Rosa" Land...

Well, folks -- it has come to our attention that "Rosa Rubicondoir" is nothing more than an obscure internet assclown that nobody actually cares to read about, so, we are proud to announce that our blog will now be entirely dedicated to Intelligent Design and the "Rosa Rube" part of this series will be ending tonight. 

Seriously, there is no real point in exposing a fraud (over and over) and it really is time to move on to bigger (more positive) things.  

However, we are going to keep the sarcastic blog name as a neat little discussion piece as well as a "tongue-in-cheek" dedication to irrelevant assclowns everywhere.

3 Day Summary:

1.  "Rosa" claims to have millions of followers, but her Blog articles consistently generate ZERO comments which exposes her as being just a self-deluded idiot.

2.  "Rosa" often denies proven facts that are listed right in front of her own eyes -- literally straight up denies the existence of written text sitting right in front of her own eyes, lol.

3. "Rosa" censors and deletes anything that challenges her monologue and / or agenda. 

4.  "Rosa" thinks everyone who challenges her bullshit is some fictional guy named "Manny", but even more amusing is the fact that she now thinks everybody on facebook is me, lol.

BTW, Rosa-- I have been advertising this blog under my real name since day 1 and the "Tick"  was never a secret identity of any kind, it's just a humorous pseudonym and the only person on the entire internet who thought my identity was a secret  is YOU!!

On another humorous note:

We all love the fact that "Rosa" and "Bill" are active members on Christopher Hartsil's fake ID group, lol,  as they both ensure that it remains a total joke page and they basically end up driving all intelligent people away.   

Some poor Atheist got attacked by her for pointing out that she probably wasn't a real account and  she claimed that it was her fictional stalker, Manny, and then after awhile started calling the guy "Timmy" until the member got fed up with it all and left, lol.

Keep up the great work, assclowns of the world :)

Final note:

Our Blog is looking for new contributors and anyone interested in writing Pro-ID articles are welcome to do so.

Natural Genetic Engineering

"Natural Genetic Engineering (NGE) is a process cited by James Shapiro (molecular biologist) in order to account for major innovation and novelty in regard to Biological Evolution.

Shapiro developed his work in peer-reviewed publications and then later outlined a more detailed paradigm in his book: "Evolution: A View from the 21st Century". He also proposes NGE to account for several counterexamples in regard to the "Central Dogma" of Biology, a 1970's proposal in which the direction and flow of sequence information is only from DNA to DNA (DNA to RNA) to proteins -- and never the reverse.

The molecular pioneer (and bacterial expert) draws conclusions from work as diverse as the adaptivity of the mammalian immune system, ciliate macronuclei and epigenetics. Shapiro's NGE also gained a measure of notoriety after being championed by proponents of Intelligent Design."

An extensive list of peer-reviewed NGE papers can be found here:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.2009.1178.issue-1/issuetoc

Demented "Rosa" blunders again!!!!

Lessons in Dementia -- Case in point: ROSA RUBE.

So, as mentioned in my last Blog post,  "Rosa" is very busy ripping beloved Mother Teresa a new A-hole and I casually pointed out that she failed to include this part of the original article in her "Copy / Paste":

"It is printed on Missionaries of Charity letterhead but is unsigned, and thus cannot be verified absolutely as having been written by Mother Teresa. Officials in the Missionaries of Charity and the Jesuits did not respond to requests for comment on its provenance."

Her response was as follows:

"Oh! Manuel!  How careless of you!
You appear to have 'forgotten' to include the rest of the quote:  "Officials in the Missionaries of Charity and the Jesuits did not respond to requests for comment on its provenance."

First of all, who the hell is Manuel?  

"Rosa" appears to have some imaginary pet-name that she calls everyone who disputes her and it would be humorous if it wasn't so mentally deranged.   But, the real point here is that her claim about my quote is obviously false.   My quote resides in plain view and her response appears just 2 inches below it and "Rosa" is clearly misguided and incorrect.

But, it gets even worse!!!   I chimed back in to point this out (fully expecting her to delete the response as any normal person would) but instead she DENIED that she was wrong and refused to even acknowledge the FACT that she is clearly wrong.

Is this individual mentally retarded?
No, seriously -- it's an honest question.

Rosie's Money Scam

Nobody should ever actually visit the "Rosa" blog, as it is just a money making scam where she says obnoxious things in order to drive traffic.

Rosa is not even a real Atheist, so don't waste your time.
Interested parties can get all official updates from our COMMERCIAL FREE blog.

Little Rosie Rube -- lying on the internet since 2011.

"Rosa Rubicondior is an atheist from the UK who has been insisting that there is some great conspiracy at Choosing Hats to systematically delete comments submitted by atheists. Her harebrained conspiracy theory was easily dealt with in my latest post here - http://www.choosinghats.org/2011/12/a-brief-response-to-atheist-rosa-rubicondiors-conspiracy-theory. Rosa simply does not have a leg to stand on. Not only have a handful of the contributors to the site engaged in numerous public debates with atheists, but we have spent hours answering comments from atheists posted to this site – our site – in an attempt to answer their concerns, and this is to say nothing of the many posts here that are direct exchanges with atheist thinkers from other blogs (or our offline interactions with atheists). It is quite the understatement to say that Rosa’s conspiracy theory is bogus. It is downright ridiculous, and anyone who bothers to spend even a few minutes perusing the site can see why.

In my previous post I not only linked to an example of where almost 100 comments have been posted with atheists arguing against us, but pointed out that one of those comments belongs to Rosa here – http://www.choosinghats.org/2011/07/the-athiests-burden-of-proof/#comment-2784. Rosa has been complaining on Twitter that her comment had not been posted and even tweeted about it yesterday, but it turns out that the comment has been on our site for months. No sooner had Rosa finished eating her crow than she tried to spin the truth in an unsuccessful attempt to save face:"

http://choosinghats.org/2011/12/rosa-rubicondior-unsuccessfully-tries-to-save-face/

Oh Dear -- "Rosa" is at it again!!!

Rosa has a new article series where she has taken to ripping the beloved  Mother Teresa a new one, which serves to further highlight the FACT that this individual is just a vile (useless) piece of garbage.

The suspicious link to a "less than credible news article" can be found here:
http://rosarubicondior.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/mother-teresa-and-paedophile-priest.html

However, "Rosa" seems to have left this portion out of her blog:

"It is printed on Missionaries of Charity letterhead but is unsigned, and thus cannot be verified absolutely as having been written by Mother Teresa. Officials in the Missionaries of Charity and the Jesuits did not respond to requests for comment on its provenance."

What's next for you, Rosa -- attacking newborn babies?  :)

Seeing Evidence Of Inept Design

Our first post is a response to "Rosa's" article entitled:
"Seeing Evidence of Inept Design"

Well, it seems as if "Rosa" is the only human being on the planet who missed the entire point that the human eye is not "Ineptly designed" after all, but is rather SPECIALIZED in regard to it's functionality.

However, as noted by EVONEWS:

"The implications of these findings have not been lost on expert optics commentators. A striking article at Phys.org about this new paper, "Fiber optic light pipes in the retina do much more than simple image transfer," reflects a keen awareness of the debate over whether the vertebrate eye is suboptimally designed. It concludes that the retinal architecture, as it now stands revealed, settles the debate. In the words of Phys.org, the notion that the vertebrate eye is suboptimally wired "is folly." Why? Because "Having the photoreceptors at the back of the retina is not a design constraint, it is a design feature." Here's the full passage from the article:

Having the photoreceptors at the back of the retina is not a design constraint, it is a design feature. The idea that the vertebrate eye, like a traditional front-illuminated camera, might have been improved somehow if it had only been able to orient its wiring behind the photoreceptor layer, like a cephalopod, is folly. Indeed in simply engineered systems, like CMOS or CCD image sensors, a back-illuminated design manufactured by flipping the silicon wafer and thinning it so that light hits the photocathode without having to navigate the wiring layer can improve photon capture across a wide wavelength band. But real eyes are much more crafty than that. A case in point are the Müller glia cells that span the thickness of the retina. These high refractive index cells spread an absorptive canopy across the retinal surface and then shepherd photons through a low-scattering cytoplasm to separate receivers, much like coins through a change sorting machine. A new paper in Nature Communications describes how these wavelength-dependent wave-guides can shuttle green-red light to cones while passing the blue-purples to adjacent rods. The idea that these Müller cells act as living fiber optic cables has been floated previously. It has even been convincingly demonstrated using a dual beam laser trap. In THIS case (THIS, like in Java programming meaning the paper just brought up) the authors couched this feat as mere image transfer, with the goal just being to bring light in with minimal distortion. (Emphasis added.)"

Welcome to the first day of the rest of your life, Rosa Rube.
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2014/08/physorg_special088541.html